Pitched as getting gene technology rules right for farmers, researchers and conservationists, TOP opposes the current Gene Technology Bill and wants a new, risk-based framework built after wider public consultation.

📋 TOP: Gene Technology Policy, May 2026 →

What it does

• Opposes the Gene Technology Bill in its current form and wants it withdrawn so a properly designed process can begin in the next parliamentary term.
• Proposes a modern, risk-based framework built on independent expert assessment and case-by-case evaluation, matching oversight to the actual risk of each use.
• Would launch a national citizens' assembly on gene technology, alongside a full Regulatory Impact Statement, an independent expert advisory panel and a transparent process for Treaty engagement.
• TOP says the bill lacks a clear liability framework for contamination, leaves risk settings to secondary legislation and makes inadequate provision for Treaty obligations.
• It also wants to protect people's ability to stay GE-free, such as growing and selling certified organic food and fibre.

The debate

• The bill seeks to end an effective 30-year ban on gene technology outside the laboratory. RNZ reported in May 2026 that it had stalled before its second reading. An ACT spokesperson said modernising the laws would give the agricultural sector and scientists the tools to stay globally competitive, while NZ First leader Winston Peters said in June his party would not support it as it stood and that it would become an election issue.
• Labour's Reuben Davidson said the bill in its current form did not balance innovation with protection, and the Greens opposed what Steve Abel called "radical de-regulation".