Did they actually say this? Yeah nah they did. 🇳🇿
← All promises
TOPPledged

Future Generations Commissioner and Act

● Governance2 tracked updates
0
✦ AI Overview

Pitched as a way to end short-term political thinking, TOP's Future Generations policy would create an independent commissioner to speak for New Zealanders who are too young to vote or not yet born.

📋 TOP: Future Generations, October 2026 →

What it does

  • A Future Generations Act would set up a Future Generations Commissioner as an independent Officer of Parliament, appointed for a five-year term, with no minister or party directing its work and funding set through the Officers of Parliament process.
  • The commissioner would guide the setting of long-term national goals through citizens' assemblies and public forums designed with Māori participation, then track progress against them.
  • Major policy, Budget and investment proposals would have to disclose their long-term costs, benefits, risks and effects on future generations, including the cost of doing nothing.
  • The role would not have the power to force governments to act on its findings. Leader Qiulae Wong put the cost at about $5 million a year.
  • The policy draws on Wales' Well-being of Future Generations Act. Wong pointed to the Welsh commissioner's role in stopping a motorway as an example of what the role could do.

The debate

  • Nate Wilbourne, Future Generations lead at Wellbeing Economy Alliance Aotearoa, which has campaigned for such an Act, welcomed the announcement.
  • National leader Christopher Luxon said he had not seen the proposal but it sounded like "more waffle". Labour leader Chris Hipkins said he was open to a conversation after the election but was deeply sceptical such a body would change anything, pointing to the Productivity Commission and the Families Commission.
  • Asked why politicians would treat a new commissioner differently from existing watchdogs, Wong said public involvement would make long-term goals harder to dismiss.

This overview is summarised by AI from public sources. It may contain errors and is a guide, not the definitive record — we welcome corrections.

❓ Our Questions — you decide

Where our research raises a question the policy doesn't answer, we put it to you — these are our questions, not government policy. Your vote stays anonymous even when you sign up (we use sign-up only to send you more things to vote on that you care about), and we report aggregated results only — the country's sentiment, never how any individual voted.

Should New Zealand create an independent commissioner to represent the interests of future generations in government decisions?
0
Should major government policies and Budgets be required to disclose their long-term costs and effects on future generations?
0
Should long-term national goals be set with input from citizens' assemblies rather than only by elected politicians?
0

Key milestones

Oct 2026official
Future Generations policy launched

TOP launched its Future Generations policy, promising a Future Generations Act and an independent commissioner to set long-term national goals with the public and hold decision-makers to account for their effects on future New Zealanders.

Future Generations (Opportunity policy page) ↗
Oct 2026news
Major parties sceptical

National leader Christopher Luxon said the idea sounded like "more waffle", while Labour's Chris Hipkins said he was open to a conversation but deeply sceptical a commissioner would change anything. Wong put the cost at about $5 million a year.

Wong says she's never posed with gangs, slams 'tit for tat' photo row (1News) ↗

Sources

Do you still agree with this promise? In the live site, your vote here feeds your weekly email digest and the party scorecards on the home page.