Did they actually say this? Yeah nah they did. 🇳🇿
← All promises
ACTPledged

Let landlords offset rental losses against their other income again

● Tax2 tracked updates
0
✦ AI Overview

Pitched as removing what ACT calls one of Labour's renters' taxes, on the argument that costs placed on landlords flow through to tenants and that easing landlords' cashflow will support rental investment and new homes.

📋 ACT: Abolish Labour's Rental Tax, October 2026 →

What it does

  • Ends loss ring-fencing for residential rental property, so losses incurred from the day the policy takes effect can be offset against other taxable income, such as wages.
  • Applies to existing homes and new builds. Losses already ring-fenced stay under the current rules.
  • ACT says the change brings deductions forward rather than increasing the total, but accepts it has a fiscal cost: revenue falls by $264 million in year one, rising to $303 million in year four, which is counted in its fiscal plan.
  • The NZ Herald's worked example: an investor with a $10,000 rental loss and a $100,000 salary would pay tax on $90,000 instead of $100,000.
  • Announced on 14 October 2026.

The debate

David Seymour said there is "no such thing as a tax on landlords that renters can safely ignore" and that the change levels the playing field with sole traders and commercial property investors, while predicting opponents would call it tax cuts for landlords. The Labour-led government introduced ring-fencing in 2019 to level the playing field between property investors and owner-occupiers, and the NZ Herald reported that 2018 advice from Inland Revenue and Treasury warned that offsetting rental losses against other income could help investors outbid owner-occupiers.

This overview is summarised by AI from public sources. It may contain errors and is a guide, not the definitive record — we welcome corrections.

❓ Our Questions — you decide

Where our research raises a question the policy doesn't answer, we put it to you — these are our questions, not government policy. Your vote stays anonymous even when you sign up (we use sign-up only to send you more things to vote on that you care about), and we report aggregated results only — the country's sentiment, never how any individual voted.

Should landlords be able to offset rental losses against their wages and other income?
0
Should rental property losses be treated the same way as losses in other businesses?
0
Should the tax system treat property investors and owner-occupiers differently?
0

Key milestones

14 Oct 2026official
ACT pledges to end rental loss ring-fencing

ACT said residential rental losses incurred from the day the policy takes effect could be offset against other taxable income, covering existing homes and new builds, at a cost of $264 million in year one rising to $303 million.

ACT to abolish another of Labour's renters' taxes (ACT) ↗
14 Oct 2026news
Seymour expects 'tax cuts for landlords' criticism

RNZ reported Seymour said the rule had raised landlords' costs and rents, and that he expected opponents to call the change tax cuts for landlords.

ACT promises tax relief for landlords with offset rental losses (RNZ) ↗

Sources

Do you still agree with this promise? In the live site, your vote here feeds your weekly email digest and the party scorecards on the home page.